Complementary Proof Nets for Classical Logic
نویسندگان
چکیده
Abstract A complementary system for a given logic is proof whose theorems are exactly the formulas that not valid according to in question. This article contribution theory of classical propositional logic. In particular, we present proof-net system, $$\textsf{CPN}$$ CPN , sound and complete with respect set all classically invalid (one-side) sequents. We also show cut elimination enjoys strong normalization along confluence (and, hence, uniqueness normal forms).
منابع مشابه
Canonical Proof nets for Classical Logic
Proof nets provide abstract counterparts to sequent proofs modulo rule permutations; the idea being that if two proofs have the same underlying proof-net, they are in essence the same proof. Providing a convincing proof-net counterpart to proofs in the classical sequent calculus is thus an important step in understanding classical sequent calculus proofs. By convincing, we mean that (a) there s...
متن کاملExpansion Nets: Proof-Nets for Propositional Classical Logic
We give a calculus of proof-nets for classical propositional logic. These nets improve on a proposal due to Robinson by validating the associativity and commutativity of contraction, and provide canonical representants for classical sequent proofs modulo natural equivalences. We present the relationship between sequent proofs and proof-nets as an annotated sequent calculus, deriving formulae de...
متن کاملWhat Is the Problem with Proof Nets for Classical Logic?
There is a very close and well-understood relationship between proofs in intuitionistic logic, simply typed lambda-terms, and morphisms in Cartesian closed categories. The same relationship can be established for multiplicative linear logic (MLL), where proof nets take the role of the lambda-terms, and starautonomous categories the role of Cartesian closed categories. It is certainly desirable ...
متن کاملFrobenius Proof Nets and Resource Semantics for Classical Logic
The once-intractable problem “is there such a thing as a Boolean category” — a category which is to a Boolean algebra what a cartesian-closed category with coproducts is to a Heyting algebra — has been given several solutions during the last six years or so. But, we still cannot say we have a really satisfying solution. The cleanest way to represent a category of logical formulas and proofs is ...
متن کاملProof Nets for Intuitionistic Logic
Until the beginning of the 20th century, there was no way to reason formally about proofs. In particular, the question of proof equivalence had never been explored. When Hilbert asked in 1920 for an answer to this very question in his famous program, people started looking for proof formalizations. Natural deduction and sequent calculi, which were invented by Gentzen in 1935, quickly became two...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Logica Universalis
سال: 2023
ISSN: ['1661-8300', '1661-8297']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11787-023-00337-9